Save the date!
ALR2018 will be held February 11-14, 2018 in Banff, Alberta, Canada.
Cohen, D.A., Marsh, T., Williamson, S., Golinelli, D., & McKenzie, T.L. (2012). Impact and Cost-effectiveness of Family Fitness Zones: A Natural Experiment in Urban Public Parks. Health & Place, 18(1), 39-45.
We evaluated the impact of outdoor exercise equipment (FZ, Fitness Zones) in 12 parks serving diverse populations. We used the System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities (SOPARC) to assess use and estimate energy expenditure prior to and twice after FZ installation. Park use increased more in FZ parks than in 10 control parks that did not get equipment, but the difference was not statistically significant. However, self-reports of being a new park user increased more in FZ parks, and estimated energy expenditure in FZ parks was higher at both follow-ups than at baseline. Installing Fitness Zones appears to be cost-effective (10.5 cents/MET increase) and most successful in parks in densely populated areas with limited facilities. Longer-term follow-up measures are needed to determine if the early increases in physical activity associated with the Fitness Zone installations are sustained.
Our transportation and physical activity infographic translated into Spanish.
Active Living Research translates and disseminates evidence to advocates, policy-makers and practitioners aimed at preventing childhood obesity and promoting active communities.
MOVE!A BLOG ABOUT ACTIVE LIVING
Highlights from the release of Lancet series on urban design, transport, and health....
The Community Preventive Services Task Force recommends combined built en...
ALR website ranked 12th on list of top sites for active transportation....